Dealing with differences and its Etiquette

Abstract

This research focuses on explaining several controls and etiquettes derived from the conduct of the Companions and scholars, in how they dealt with their opponents, according to what the wise Sharia prescribed for them, and what is consistent with its purposes, and achieves its goals, the most important of which are: preserving the unity of Muslims, and protecting them from dispersion and division. The importance of the topic lies in the fact that these controls and etiquette are considered one of the most important treatments for the issue of disagreement, which has increased and worsened in this era, until disagreement has become a dispute, a dispute, and a fatal disease that threatens the body of the Islamic nation. The researcher addressed this topic in an introduction, three sections, and a conclusion. At the end of the research, the most prominent results and recommendations were summarized, which are: Difference and diversity among things are cosmic laws. Which is included in the Holy Qur’an. The difference in opinions is not a product of this era. Rather, it existed at the time of the Companions and the imams of the sects, and it is of a praiseworthy type, which did not cause hatred, fanaticism, or division between them. It has become clear that the praiseworthy difference that occurred in the branches of jurisprudence was the reason for the development of science, the enrichment and diversity of the Islamic library, the establishment of doctrines, the facilitation, the removal of embarrassment, and the keeping of rulings with contemporary issues. It has become clear that the reprehensible disagreement among Muslims, which is not regulated by the etiquette and controls of disagreement, is the problem of the era, with its bad effects on all fields: religious, social, political, and economic, and it is one of the main reasons that led to their division, weakness, and complacency, which made their enemies lie in wait for them. Victory in liberating their lands was delayed. The extremists of disagreement in this era do not rely on reliable scientific reasons to justify their disagreement, as it has become clear that their disagreement is of a reprehensible type, which does not resemble the etiquette that the nation’s predecessors used to have when disagreeing, and that most of them do not have scientific credit, and are dominated by whims and imitation. Intolerance and narrow-mindedness. It has become clear that adopting the etiquette of disagreement and knowing its controls are important solutions to the issue of disagreement, either by addressing it or alleviating its impact. The researcher recommends that officials in the Libyan state pay special attention to this problem, by calling on all segments of society to unite their efforts to reject differences and unite the word. It also recommends holding conferences and seminars; To identify the effects of reprehensible difference, its dangers, and develop radical solutions to it. Developing curricula in basic, middle, and university education; To teach students methods of disciplined dialogue, the foundations of dialogue, and acceptance of others. Focus in the media on broadcasting purposeful programs that highlight the importance of dialogue and teaching it to people. In conclusion, the researcher asks God Almighty that he has succeeded in the work he has done in this research. He also asks him for sincerity, acceptance, and benefit to those who read it.